From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,470860aa3e635a7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT for MS Visual Studio
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:44:52 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Message-ID: <m2lkae95uz.fsf@mac.com>
References: <13duou81kg3sd1c@corp.supernews.com>
 <fd1so0$lmu$1@jacob-sparre.dk> <QISdna5WdIMntGjbnZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <rkr7df.7mp.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <soednbei8rlx-mXbnZ2dnUVZ_rignZ2d@comcast.com>
 <xwir5zj8j2.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <wvbrabr9hq0t.fsf@astra06.norway.sun.com>
 <ePWdnf5PGZFiwmfbnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <ltfy11y10v.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <TJSdncwgUrlA-2HbnZ2dnUVZ_ramnZ2d@comcast.com>
 <4xsl4zw3bp.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <YcCdnaCp_dEWKmLbnZ2dnUVZ_qqgnZ2d@comcast.com> <fdsf0r$q0t$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1191357491.860178.230380@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <4702ADCC.7080209@obry.net>
 <1191439439.120567.172630@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <4703F02D.3030207@obry.net>
 <1191682021.844225.236870@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <4707A3D0.3070702@obry.net> <fe9j33$968$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <47088904.1090201@obry.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1191779092 18207 62.49.19.209 (7 Oct 2007 17:44:52
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:10yihzsargA2HOwFP/M93pjkNnY=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (darwin)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2339
Date: 2007-10-07T18:44:52+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net> writes:

> Look it is not that unusual to have a container populated for a
> simulation that after initialization point does not need to be
> updated but only *read*. I have many concurrent simulations like
> this. I would have expected to be able to use the containers in this
> case.

I suppose you could just copy the initialized container! (depends
rather on the size, of course).

task body T is
  C : Container;
begin
  accept Start (Using : Container) do
    C := Using;
  end Start;

--S