From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,235855e3822c83d1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr4248330pbc.1.1336933241227;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 11:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni21992pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Importing C function with variable argument list
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 19:20:38 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2likw9c3t.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
References: 
 <610ee323-4c7f-413d-8568-aed4955f5152@z38g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
	<jm1bug$2dp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m2zkajfs9d.fsf@pushface.org>
	<jm69iq$vjc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<1288794.275.1334249936588.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlp2>
	<jm7f0m$ugp$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<slrnjpklu5.1lme.lithiumcat@sigil.instinctive.eu>
	<696103.1385.1336076109161.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbez18>
	<3eduq7lqvgmp2ui5kt1k5pgk2oopvo9o31@4ax.com>
	<m2sjf4a1w6.fsf@nidhoggr.home> <joopkt$iqb$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="Pd4gCuG8QV/d3K7tc8x0Wg";
	logging-data="31345"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+grkaNbIl2UyAHSMnPmrXYxKhgwC81Blw="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fac3fkoRoaPeYasC+xLbW4Jvijk=
	sha1:vf6dM48X9SurhBcRwL9AkE+dVU0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-05-13T19:20:38+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:

> On 05/13/2012 02:03 AM, Simon Wright wrote:
>>
>> And for Ada, Integer'Size is 32.
>
> No, it's not.

What I originally wrote was

>> On Mac OS X (definitely Lion, probably all) C uses i386/limits.h for
>> both i386 and x86_64. So it's 32-bit ints for both.
>> 
>> And for Ada, Integer'Size is 32.

and although it is certainly true that there is nothing in the ARM that
says that Integer'Size should be 32 the fact is that *on Mac OS X Lion*
it very definitely is.

Also on Debian 6 amd64.

Now, the size of an 'access Integer' is 64 on both.