From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1d728aa632a5b94
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.220.230 with SMTP id pz6mr24540253pbc.3.1341918588196;
        Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni11278pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:09:47 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2liirzxc4.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
References: <c231a9b2-8fb7-41ab-98a2-72173a08f66c@googlegroups.com>
	<48efa098-30ee-473d-af17-8de323a54967@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="c5d47e33cdb0a6fb95c07f57c1728133";
	logging-data="32136"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19deZxof1aiVOBBE1wT3kfFi8WkOQhscSE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S/eexFnUHplPObHxP8SfyBQd0aw=
	sha1:MaSv5rx7DTk91MarjLoCeE5GZkk=
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2012-07-10T12:09:47+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Rod Kay <rodakay@internode.on.net> writes:

> Also, it seems I managed to introduce a different error in my (not
> so) cut-down version of the code (ie deriving types within a body,
> rather than spec), which Dmitri pointed out. Would two bug reports be
> in order then ?

Yes. They may well be caused by different compiler issues.