From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9fda87b69cc476dd
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.14.199.6 with SMTP id w6mr57038een.0.1349940739946;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q11ni134268966wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!216.40.29.245.MISMATCH!novia!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-04.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Do really Ada give you a camel when you expected a horse?
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:19:15 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2lifi3g24.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <op.wlse87ecule2fv@douda-yannick>
	<dus17850e89u64blmq9jhl8eb3sdm2q67b@invalid.netcom.com>
	<op.wlshqhqxule2fv@douda-yannick>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="7d2d00b559fb51f460ee917cabfedd73";
	logging-data="4592"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/PhWhpXuVSmI/ZnWXj6MwF9kJWiGkdUA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WOQR0Ns2FHb4tiELar747aJv1cM=
	sha1:vFFFm11+BnVDBc5KpxK3pVvPyNQ=
X-Received-Bytes: 1676
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-10-07T08:19:15+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:

> By the way, I'm not sure to know what's the exact difference between a
> team and a committee.

Off the top of my head, all the members of the team work on the product;
a committee has (a) authority over the technical content of the product,
and (b) members whose only technical role is to review the product.

Not all committees are bad!