From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2690a5e963b61b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.xsnews.nl!feeder.news-service.com!azure.qinip.net!xara.net!gxn.net!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Ada.Containers Cursor danger. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:20:36 +0100 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <1120474891.635131.216700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42cb8d21$0$22761$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <42cd064c$0$10817$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <42cda8c4$0$22780$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1u3hh2597i4ne$.1ryetugksbmus.dlg@40tude.net> <1120834341.499757.133770@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1121093867.964444.232420@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42d2bc2d$0$20148$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1121134291.379399.79460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <42d46b51$0$18005$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <42d6ef47$0$7644$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1121836818 276 62.49.19.209 (20 Jul 2005 05:20:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:njZ09JBnO9KC5qUfVxRxRjLPHAI= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3693 Date: 2005-07-20T06:20:36+01:00 List-Id: Matthew Heaney writes: > Access types wouldn't work, since you would have to declare the > container element as "aliased" in order to return an access value, > but that would constrain the object (fix the value of the > discriminant). Is this still true in 0Y?