From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,28f9da0e028af98b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is the Ada compiler of Polyspace invalid?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:42:38 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2k4gx2t1d.fsf@pushface.org>
References: 
 <0c1168ed-e09e-4555-a77e-40620dd80628@f15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1102181624190.7358@Bluewhite64.example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="10748"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NMED5BBsjHeZ4Rd8LeDFzAdNnC5x0d2M="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3FN9OxAN7WHZ7tcbqd963QwARUg=
	sha1:BlNqGxvN1rKx7nLOLhgy9p8nFwM=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17425
Date: 2011-02-18T16:42:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Paul Colin Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org> writes:

> Julian Leyh <julian@VGAI.De> sent on February 18th, 2011:
> |-------------------------------------------------------------|
> |"Hi,                                                         |
> |                                                             |
> |I have some Ada code, which I would like to try Polyspace on.|
> |                                                             |
> |It contains something like this (simplified):                |
> |                                                             |
> |foo.ads:                                                     |
> |procedure foo;                                               |
> |                                                             |
> |foo.adb:                                                     |
> |procedure foo is                                             |
> |...                                                          |
> |end foo;                                                     |
> |                                                             |
> |somewhere else:                                              |
> |with foo;"                                                   |
> |-------------------------------------------------------------|
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you really have something like that? You cannot WITH a procedure.

Yes you can.

ARM 10.1.1(6)
[http://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/05rm/html/RM-10-1-1.html]
includes subprogram_declaration in library_declaration.

I assure you that this works!