From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kingdon@harvey.cyclic.com (Jim Kingdon)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/06/11
Message-ID: <m2ivcyxydf.fsf@harvey.cyclic.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 159614818
sender: kingdon@harvey.cyclic.com
references: <4mq7mg$8hs@jake.probe.net>
organization: very little
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> The "mandate" is under review, but that's a LONG way from "has been
> lifted", and it's _definitely_ not the way I would bet.
> More info can be found at: http://www2.nas.edu/cstbweb/21b6.html

I agree.  One can usually make a pretty good guess about what this
sort of committee will say by looking at who is on it.  And I noticed
quite a few Ada people listed.  Ergo.....