From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f894972725d7613 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ronald Cole Subject: Re: Ada strangeness or bug in Gnat? Date: 1996/11/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 194918192 sender: ronald@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us references: <328028AE.757F@direct.ca> organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA. (619) 371-3501 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-11-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: rodemann@mathematik.uni-ulm.de (Joerg Rodemann) writes: > Sure? Soory, but i haven't got my RM at hand right now. But i tried this > sample program with GNAT-3.05 on HPUX 10.10. It says: 1,2. That means the > array elements were swapped --- correctly? The PA-RISC port of GNAT has some esoteric problems... (in the backend, to be more precise) I wouldn't posit the correctness of my programs on the basis of the results I get upon running it on this platform. -- Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412 Ronald Cole Phone: (619) 499-9142 President, CEO Fax: (619) 499-9152 My PGP fingerprint: E9 A8 E3 68 61 88 EF 43 56 2B CE 3E E9 8F 3F 2B