From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,bb14f1c1986544fb X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does Ada need a 'secure coding standard' as well? Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:37:55 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ"; logging-data="21799"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9J6O4tfPxD2HcJK/snl04qMKf7VjiRcc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:etOV4ONdGYrk2RPA0ERsUw8xskc= sha1:6Ku0vDge1GMhKnF3VVDXcMS2Rjs= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20516 Date: 2011-05-28T22:37:55+01:00 List-Id: "Nasser M. Abbasi" writes: > https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/seccode/CERT+C+Secure+Coding+Standard I wouldn't have rated https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/seccode/POS39-C.+Use+the+correct+byte+ordering+when+transferring+data+between+systems as a _guideline_ exactly! Or https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/seccode/FIO09-C.+Be+careful+with+binary+data+when+transferring+data+across+systems come to that.