From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e29c511c2b08561c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ronald Cole Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Date: 1996/06/30 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 162949257 sender: usenet@ridgecrest.ca.us (Ridgenet Usenet admin) x-nntp-posting-host: annex046 references: <9606212019.AA11075@eight-ball> organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA. (619) 371-3501 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-06-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Maybe not really as young as you think. First it uses the gcc backend, > so it benefits from the years and miles traveled by GNU C, and we have > very few problems with the code generator. And those few problems that you do have (-O2 generates bad code on HPPA) don't look like they're going to be fixed any time soon... -- Ronald Cole E-mail: ronald@ridgecrest.ca.us President, CEO zippy@ecst.csuchico.edu Forte International Fax: (619) 384-2346 My PGP fingerprint: E9 A8 E3 68 61 88 EF 43 56 2B CE 3E E9 8F 3F 2B