From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,80bc3e0698be468f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.icl.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Type safety on wikipedia Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:24:37 +0000 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <1138260496.230283.147640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <43D8B95E.80001@mailinator.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1138307073 17748 62.49.19.209 (26 Jan 2006 20:24:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ha5Mnc0FdHtTi4rPuD/PrHL5ptg= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2664 Date: 2006-01-26T20:24:37+00:00 List-Id: "Alex R. Mosteo" writes: > Martin Krischik wrote: >> Hello >> I found this interesting article on Wikipedia which made me think a >> bit: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_safety >> Do have a look at the talk page as well. > > After reading that I'm not sure how Ada can be type safe if unchecked > deallocation is a common way of implementing relatively common tasks > as linked lists and so. The explicit example given for "type unsafety" > is easily doable in Ada. > > But I acknowledge that I'm new to the topic, anyone can explain? As the page says (near the end) "The following languages are type safe by default but can free themself from the type systems when needed." and then lists Ada.