From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c1125c290d9dd14
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions, 20100810 release
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:06:51 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2fwyfu7o4.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <m2lj8eywqo.fsf@pushface.org> <m2bp98n82h.fsf@pushface.org>
	<82ocd8m826.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<fcb82785-db37-4c95-9169-68c210ae47a3@l6g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<82sk2ivwa7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <m2zkwpupn7.fsf@pushface.org>
	<9b04znr94b2i$.pxsxi24sc9zv.dlg@40tude.net>
	<m2vd7duhrk.fsf@pushface.org>
	<cjw5bwms827c.1g19zxd6btyex.dlg@40tude.net>
	<m2zkwouafa.fsf@pushface.org>
	<1mffa50u8u2xy$.1gvly4gmdy3f5.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:06:52 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew";
	logging-data="3097"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+x44R2tpb+b+eYcMFbiV0BHxJK0O0T5KI="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XpeUJHWRM/DT3Jx7znXrKo2VjIE=
	sha1:6jOnrdeDM2CT2dU7TTSrXrFxxi0=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13349
Date: 2010-08-15T18:06:51+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:55:05 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:
>
>> I found that I could say
>> 
>>    package body Whatever is
>> 
>>       subtype Real is Complex_Arrays.Real_Arrays.Real;
>
> Yes you can, but don't. I used this pattern before and ran into problems
> with this, when in some contexts one Real conflicted with / hid another, so
> that a compiled generic package could not be instantiated. (Again, no idea
> if that was a compiler bug or not.)

In this case I had to use Complex_Arrays.Real_Arrays.Real because of the
sort of problems you indicate. So naming it seemed like a good idea.