From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d79efdb8dde2c5a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to structure examples for Rosetta Code
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:16:16 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2fwydrqwv.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <op.vhguffh3ule2fv@garhos>
	<589eea9a-0b14-4ae5-bf62-9abf4b33e7fb@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<i49oif$1c85$1@adenine.netfront.net> <op.vhh3bwnwxmjfy8@garhos>
	<82mxsnuhbq.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<b08743ce-a85f-4962-8fbb-c2601b9cc4a1@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vhjindufxmjfy8@garhos> <4c69a251$0$2371$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
	<op.vhjyi5kkxmjfy8@garhos>
	<871v9xlkm9.fsf_-_@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:16:17 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew";
	logging-data="5790"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19daD7CIeooJ2wNlFUEM85rut+Lc/EJsNs="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:feyK03aKCNWKbtChO5Jpad4PP/U=
	sha1:KxNzp2H1UP74CbOs5m8qWJ2t2q4=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13466
Date: 2010-08-17T20:16:16+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk> writes:

> I can't see anything but resources (i.e. commercial viability)
> preventing the existence of a competing SPARK compiler.  Since the
> Praxis implementation of SPARK is distributed under the GNU GPL, you
> can always start by forking that implementation.

Following on from discussions in another thread, I propose the name
SPlint for this fork.