From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d13bf824aeeb7e2b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr16211622pbb.8.1330452876654;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni19817pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question about GNAT project files.
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:14:34 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2fwdukeph.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <Cc6dnSeN8twuEdfS4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
	<40c94126-d9e5-41f4-b656-43ef1ce021bb@a15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
	<Y7qdnaIbUqprGtbS4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
	<op.waeetzsrule2fv@douda-yannick>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="20489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/khGNH6RaBczDkc61b8FBC8eNPMPxwQ30="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:63QZEWU/mmnZ46p8aGujMOgr7FE=
	sha1:SdPpxgyqHzQUsjro2nNlqFpE+d8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-28T18:14:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:

> Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:41:10 +0100, Peter C. Chapin
> <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu> a écrit:
>
>> On 2012-02-26 17:18, Greg Moncreaff wrote:
>>
>>> Look for something called an 'aggregate' project.
>>>
>>> http://www.adacore.com/wp-content/files/auto_update/gnat-unw-docs/html/gnat_ugn_12.html#SEC152
>>
>> That's interesting. I didn't realize there were such projects. I'm
>> not sure if it applies to my case though since two of my existing
>> projects  are not libraries but contains main procedures. Maybe it
>> would work  anyway.
>>
>> Peter
> Seems GNAT Pro specific, I can't retrieve the same from the FSF GNAT
> User's Guide.

There is the 4.6.0 reference[1] which seems to imply that the syntax is
accepted but has no effect, and the gprbuild reference[2].

gnatmake 4.6.0 does indeed fail to process an aggregate gpr.

gprbuild GPL 2011 succeeds (modulo some strange behaviour about library
names vs project names which I think I may have introduced when I
rebuilt gprbuild vs GCC 4.6.0???).

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.0/gnat_ugn_unw/Qualified-Projects.html#Qualified-Projects
[2] http://www.adacore.com/wp-content/files/auto_update/gprbuild-docs/html/gprbuild_ug.html#Project-Declaration