From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4cf1fd41f64f8f02
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: task-safe hash table?
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:48:15 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Message-ID: <m2d5do4xsw.fsf@grendel.local>
References: <uu07326ch.fsf@acm.org>
 <UJOdncpJU9SkAB3ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comcast.com> <uverhhygc.fsf@acm.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1149443294 3019 62.49.19.209 (4 Jun 2006 17:48:14
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:48:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HJeC2RnkedZzbVKkqHC9nMtukY4=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4676
Date: 2006-06-04T18:48:15+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org> writes:

> tmoran@acm.org writes:
>
>>> > the overhead of making it Protected would probably kill the gain.
>>>
>>> What "overhead"?
>>    In a trivial single-tasking test program on my machine, a call to a
>> Protected function compiled with Gnat 3.15p -O2 takes
>>   0.304697000 mics while a call to a regular function takes
>>   0.022779000 microseconds.
>
> Interesting. Please post the program; I'll run it with a later GNAT,
> and if the results are still so bad, submit a bug report.

I wouldn't have thought 0.3 microseconds was that bad?