From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,67d995bf9f62ea45
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: matrix package with Ada
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:55:55 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2bpa9vqo4.fsf@pushface.org>
References: 
 <f4a10af4-9232-4bda-9f3c-fe20c10e5751@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<af10bdc0-515e-4b17-a37c-47fa8809ff18@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<23f0d8f1-e7bd-4af9-a0ee-cea85cbff4bd@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
	<8f4ba975-5441-4b42-89ad-b53373a59eb9@g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<m2vd8kv4oy.fsf@pushface.org>
	<53250ca8-da19-47a9-a9b1-3cd1653fb05f@y4g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>
	<m2mxtvurgg.fsf@pushface.org>
	<88726737-eede-4e30-a7c3-9e9157fec992@c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:55:54 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew";
	logging-data="7798"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19N/lxJHRetWHiE84Edl/fa1z68YM0Q/4Q="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UmDGwEqhJ+DdUY0QiOgSOPyTDp0=
	sha1:EBwP5hLwJCRBlyH/FjH327YJ4zk=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12426
Date: 2010-07-14T19:55:55+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ada novice <posts@gmx.us> writes:

>>
>> I found that not all of the numbers were different. Some of the
>> differences were very small. Sometimes vectors were given in the
>> opposite order (there's a note in the AI about that not being a
>> problem).
>
> The eigenvalues are not given in an ascending order. Different
> software implementations use different ways to present the eigenvalues
> and eigenvectors (normalizations for the latter).

But nominally these are the same software implementation. Still, the
.dat file is dated 31 Oct 1999, the .out file 26 May 2006, so the
implementation may well have changed in this respect.