From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,72973cb941b9d7ea
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr791312pbc.2.1337062413170;
        Mon, 14 May 2012 23:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni428pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: gprbuild worked for GNAT GPL 2010, fails for 2011 edition
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 07:13:31 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m28vgu9dkk.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
References: <a04a8d21-896a-4d61-b219-26092b0df09a@r9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<m2ehqwttbq.fsf@pushface.org>
	<fd53d6c9-f6f0-4578-b55a-84b308b30fb2@d8g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>
	<m27gwlu7oz.fsf@pushface.org>
	<aaaf5735-59fe-4745-8fa9-383da674630d@k7g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>
	<16383976.2904.1336634819469.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjj16>
	<2527be23-5dd1-4c26-a4de-d80e4182a823@s9g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="Pd4gCuG8QV/d3K7tc8x0Wg";
	logging-data="6682"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yOieAaONmq1R6qZ14/4KX/ZN61WvUTY4="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ytft7RmrAvJC5iBtsVe4XMm7T8I=
	sha1:vUCRrfGkyPlkut7s2YEe+LiCjGU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-05-15T07:13:31+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> writes:

> Great! This is what I needed. Many thanks. My problem seems to be
> solved.

Good!

>          I don't know why the 2010 GPL worked with my (then)
> defective .gpr file. The only thing that I can figure out is that
> the .ali(s) was (were) referencing the .dylib because I certainly
> wasn't doing so in my .gpr. I did get an indication that the file
> format for .ali's had changed, so maybe that was it.

I doubt that was it. Hmm.