From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: API design considerations - variable-length array in record type
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:13:46 +0100
Date: 2012-10-08T12:13:46+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m28vbh2p3p.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c40023e6-e7d1-431f-8759-5ac224c0aa1f@googlegroups.com
Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> writes:
> A straightforward choice is a predefined instantiation of
> Ada.Containers.Vectors for Integer and this would be probably the
> least surprising, especially in the context of Y : Unbounded_String,
> but at the same time I'm open to consider some more lightweight
> alternatives.
This would be my choice!
> The problem is - any other alternative I can think of leads to the
> complication of API in the form of introducing
> Ada.Finalization.Controlled to the picture.
You could use "private with".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 9:03 API design considerations - variable-length array in record type Maciej Sobczak
2012-10-08 11:13 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2012-10-08 11:29 ` Egil Høvik
2012-10-08 11:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2012-10-08 14:37 ` Tero Koskinen
2012-10-09 2:02 ` Shark8
2012-10-09 5:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-09 5:45 ` Shark8
2012-10-09 5:42 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-10-09 3:10 ` Stephen Leake
2012-10-09 7:47 ` Maciej Sobczak
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox