From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,eea0f90b41664ddc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extend Record in Spec and Body Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:49:23 +0100 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <1161012646.433304.176150@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1161110960 525 62.49.19.209 (17 Oct 2006 18:49:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:23HM+EyMMdcmU0SbYF+SenwU7es= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7010 Date: 2006-10-17T19:49:23+01:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > Yes, but not in the body and each extension would produce a new > type. I have written code that extends an abstract tagged type (declared in the package spec) in the package body, why would that be a problem? (in fact I do it 3 times ...) --S