From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1a2f44f8ac0643b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.karotte.org!news2.arglkargh.de!news.cnetm.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!news.stack.nl!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!feed2.jnfs.ja.net!feed1.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!xara.net!gxn.net!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: problems with'ing ncurses support
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:12:40 +0100
Organization: Pushface
Message-ID: <m264hzj3g7.fsf@grendel.local>
References: <1152700230.062898.37290@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
 <kuhgo3-bc5.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <1152814768.405432.124560@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
 <1152889329.516455.248480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1152911560 10014 62.49.19.209 (14 Jul 2006 21:12:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:12:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P3hIbeCOwZ91x1aqF4kgG7ZbrJI=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5704
Date: 2006-07-14T22:12:40+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

randomm@mindless.com writes:

> After some thought, I decided to put ncurses in its own two libraries
> and set separate include and linker paths and it seems ok.   The only
> thing here is that compiling a program that withs curses support seems
> to create copies of the curses .ali and .o modules in the source
> directory, which seems objectionable since they already exist in the
> adalib.

Try write-protecting the .ali in the Ada library, I think that's what
tells GNAT not to recompile.