From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:16:52 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <737a6396-72bd-4a1e-8895-7d50f287960e@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <4d51905c$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <36212a7b-deab-45d9-ac45-aa29cd90c7bc@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4d51a7bb$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d52b489$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <9a8njlwvey1p.1a96yvvgdf6yu.dlg@40tude.net> <0e3fceab-5693-4d22-8ef3-cede968ef5ca@f2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <4d52d567$0$19481$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ"; logging-data="1848"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VATqihv5k1DIgXuku/gn9gREp1BiA1mo=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:raUFJN/edoITcwSsJToYvuN123U= sha1:M3GqJfck/EUybU5tZM2apzdGb5E= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18118 Date: 2011-02-09T20:16:52+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen writes: > On 2/9/2011 12:49 PM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> Anybody who sells software must become liable. > > In the U.S., software is expressive speech and cannot be > legally constrained in this way. As it should be. What about embedded software? of course, the safety case covers the whole device, the software is only a part of the system. We sue the company who built the car/heart monitor/xray machine. I imagine that the software house that subcontracted the development might well find itself in court as well.