From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4c1aeced34d252fb X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gdb will not "catch exception" or "catch exception unhandled" Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:23:06 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <22f84116-3c6f-449e-a02d-a2bc8863de98@t16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <915238bc-c2da-4a39-be8f-06997679ae56@f6g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <730fd8c1-2fee-4629-b159-31697a802068@p29g2000pra.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ"; logging-data="17048"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vqKYFl0oqXVIWQMB5gzJbLCQLlWK/UZo=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sS032+FQND1TX4gAztyYn7PxmRQ= sha1:X5tbUv6y/d7Ul61hhuGw6H84BT4= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21321 Date: 2011-10-08T09:23:06+01:00 List-Id: Jerry writes: Thanks for the clarification. When you say "plplot is built by gnatmake, not gpr" do you mean "by using -I (etc) arguments to gnatmake"? I take it you wrote PLplot_Library.gpr yourself? > Back to the main idea--if the PLplot library were built as a static > library (or linked to the .o files), would the debugger work better? Yes. Given that there are so few Ada source files involved, could you include them in your main GPR's Ada sources and link against the PLplot libraries built without the Ada parts? (if that makes sense ...)