From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f734cdbc8408497
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ronald@ridgecrest.ca.us (Ronald Cole)
Subject: Re: Gnat 2.06 Ada95 (unix) File format????
Date: 1996/06/15
Message-ID: <m24todol3x.fsf@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 160259800
sender: ronald@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us
x-nntp-posting-host: annex025
references: <4pmfr5$epc@news3.digex.net>
	15: 17:13 GMT
organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA.  (619) 371-3501
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <4pmn1p$360c@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> ucaa2385@alpha1.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de (Peter Hermann) writes:
   Mike, please, please don't come with such very old versions
   of GNAT. "Nowadays" ;-) we are at least at GNAT version 3.04
   and nobody will even read your question. I skipped it, too,
   as a result of reading the subject line. I beg your pardon ;-)

I often wonder why people want to use GNAT at all for anything
serious...  After all, the current release will be an old, stale,
dysfunctional piece of shit and completely disowned by Robert Dewar
immediately after the next release!  (or so he keeps telling the bloke
who keeps producing the Ada CD-ROM set a version or two behind...)

-- 
Ronald Cole                                     E-mail: ronald@ridgecrest.ca.us
President, CEO                                          zippy@ecst.csuchico.edu
Forte International                                Fax: (619) 384-2346
     My PGP fingerprint: E9 A8 E3 68 61 88 EF 43  56 2B CE 3E E9 8F 3F 2B