From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,590b710e61b9ddf8
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr11176248pbb.8.1329182028068;
        Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni22109pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Concurrency always is non-deterministic?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:13:47 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m24nuu2p4k.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <3721724.784.1329154891821.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcwt9>
	<1xf56jbutoa3$.sd93docj14m0$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<m28vk634mr.fsf@pushface.org>
	<CB5F1B52.1013F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="6296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Ft4RSffh4BdWNwR8oJPHHhaHGybLq21s="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FuDzV7z/YgYebmq6+oE96Kt7bLQ=
	sha1:M2FprMSYcPvOtOZ2OwzD9UlyFyE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-02-14T01:13:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:

> On 13/02/2012 19:38, in article m28vk634mr.fsf@pushface.org, "Simon Wright"
> <simon@pushface.org> wrote:

>> A somewhat different statement from the one I'm used to, which is pretty
>> much as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computing
>
> "The needs of real-time software requires the use of one or more synchronous
> programming languages" ??
>
> Methinks someone is grinding a proprietary axe.

Hmm. I've added a query to the Disputed section of the Talk page.