From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,81bb2ce65a3240c3 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr696016wer.5.1343320480983; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr423878pbc.7.1343317750840; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Path: ge7ni76961921wib.0!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-C.news.volia.net!u4no7227970pbs.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni65235679pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.swapon.de!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X? Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:22:46 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <569c077e-3703-42de-a98f-dc29774fc3c0@googlegroups.com> <4ffec69a$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2b7ac4c347cd2e988a774c08b2f7df8d"; logging-data="16477"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FtDUB7/x+QrA20YF3dBsyxJwU1Sro1ds=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:x3oqRR9fLSNeX+PMYKPEWZs2keE= sha1:jspWGMuq7WgYhcdGt//d+INu1WI= X-Original-Bytes: 1703 Content-Type: text/plain Date: 2012-07-19T19:22:46+01:00 List-Id: David Thompson writes: > I manually broke for the reply, because Agent (arguably conformingly > but inconveniently) won't break reply-quoted lines. This is a thing that Emacs Gnus does really well (using M-q).