From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: cm@mihalis.demon.co.uk (Chris Morgan) Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1997/01/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 209256227 x-nntp-posting-host: mihalis.demon.co.uk references: <5acjtn$5uj@news3.digex.net> organization: Linux Hackers Unlimited newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-01-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes (regarding an "attempt automatic inline" switch : > It certainly would be easy to implement a compiler option to force this > treatment, but so far none of our customers has suggested this as a > requirement. If it's that easy we would like to try it (customer #133) :-) Chris -- Never run with scissors.