From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,751d508677a5add1 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA made me hate programming Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:43:26 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8f469661-370c-4484-82d8-f1b365455e0f@w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew"; logging-data="6584"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lIDOy+ktFSDQyumctCvttKZ0cy0Ph+5I=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:am13LbiLfw5pa7MIBTK+dQk6+I0= sha1:DOOKsmp4JmftG/LGROSuPrt8XiA= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12168 Date: 2010-07-03T22:43:26+01:00 List-Id: anon@att.net writes: > In , Simon Wright writes: >>anon@att.net writes: >> >>> In <4205a7a1-e193-4057-b19c-7ae4a3122a1b@32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, sjw writes: >> >>>>And what makes you think that the missile launch computer won't use IP >>>>to talk to the target tracking sensor computers? >>> >>> The internet contains a swamp of hackers both domestic and foreign >>> that would love to get it hands on a missle. You ever heard of >>> terrorist. So, to control a missle on the internet is treason type of >>> programming. >> >>I said "IP" which means "Internet Protocol". Never for one moment did I >>suggest that such a system would be connected to the Internet. >> >>If two computers need to communicate and IP over Ethernet is suitable >>(and that includes an awful lot of military systems) we would be wasting >>the taxpayers' money and our own limited resources to roll our own comms >>stack when we can get one off the shelf. > > I knew what you meant by "IP". But: > > 1. Once a missle is launched the any wired "IP" is no long a valid > port. I should have also pointed out that I was talking about the missile launch computer talking to the target tracking computer, *not* about missile control computer to missile. And indeed in the system I'm working on IP *is* the comms stack for this purpose.