From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.216.234.135 with SMTP id s7mr665705weq.8.1345381403064;
        Sun, 19 Aug 2012 06:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 n2ni209310990win.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!78.46.240.70.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:03:22 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2393jxcdh.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wi78rmfska8ora@aspire.local>
	<17eab721-33da-4957-ab73-63221f1a9f6f@googlegroups.com>
	<m2boi7yijo.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
	<0f69bf7d-de32-4396-ba8d-955f8aa7528c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="f0da64ccd4791c80ba5fb6b10d855629";
	logging-data="14489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IY63psAV1VajoETvr5Gec/70q+zlvLJk="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:z3yHxldULh+n4I/NKHQnSZNBTNM=
	sha1:1aXLYYM6nremn7ROO4eW65lQY+E=
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2012-08-19T14:03:22+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> writes:

> To be more specific: It's stupid to try to use a tool to achieve a
> goal which is directly opposite of the tool's design-goal. (In HTML
> it's that HTML *doesn't* specify layout, but instead leaves that to
> the client.)

Now that I can 100% agree with.