From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,fea50f781bb229dc
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Symbolic tracebacks on Debian
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:46:59 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m21vd2v1sc.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <xpapqc7al1kx$.10dcevapcbh68.dlg@40tude.net>
	<85f51aeb-cac9-4591-921a-a7f50c8ef142@a21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<1pup1z7a4f1pq$.of30sejrqe4m.dlg@40tude.net>
	<87hbmae33k.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <85j595F1lqU1@mid.individual.net>
	<87sk5navk6.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<82bpc8s17m.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<C81D7888.14413C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
	<m2aarsuqis.fsf@pushface.org> <82eih2rblr.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<m2632evcn3.fsf@pushface.org>
	<C81F33EC.14438D%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:47:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew";
	logging-data="14472"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MeuZTer0Ez7tCS7KeuYSXWJ2fWUPChXg="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qKy5D+pG52wNUrMzHu4taIr6tZk=
	sha1:xQziYR2EFUz04/fuDTzRoesPVX8=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11909
Date: 2010-05-23T20:46:59+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:

> Are these features enabled in your OS X port, Simon?

That was a prerelease 4.5.0 -- presently running with my build of the
official GCC release.

So far as I know, these features are the same.. yes, just tried it.

The tracebacks you get with atos are rather opaque, and the tool is too
stupid to work out the architecture for itself ..

   $ atos -o t -arch x86_64 0x100001577 0x10000141b
   _ada_t (in t) (t.adb:16)
   main (in t) (b~t.adb:196)
   $ atos -o t -arch x86_64 0x100001742 0x10000aa82 0x7fff825fb8b4
   t__tTKB.2815 (in t) + 86
   system__tasking__stages__task_wrapper (in t) + 418
   0x7fff825fb8b4