From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.191.225 with SMTP id hb1mr7246633pbc.5.1338227712229;
        Mon, 28 May 2012 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni59350pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:55:11 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m21um4ur5s.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <1oc91jvo56lsw.vg8ngdczgirv$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<jpvo0q$1on$1@dont-email.me>
	<1j399t809qd94.1no66gtodvgmn$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="06LfmZGtYadNPriz+0aGoA";
	logging-data="14505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CtkEjmgjUxGhCPQuflnUD4SImMlwNJCQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uym4Qw+z9XN2yrNkrlJXWkORrRA=
	sha1:8lP5WlAcAfv3B8M+o5E8GjZnFRE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-05-28T18:55:11+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> I thought GMGPL allowed derivative works to be restricted as anybody
> wanted?

Depends what you mean by 'derivative'.

I can take your GMGPL'd work and use it to build proprietary software.

But I can't take your work and issue it myself with a different licence
(I can, I believe, issue it with a plain GPL, but can't see the evidence
for that).

I'm not sure how much I can amend your work before its GMGPL no longer
applies. I guess that bugfixes would be OK! (not that I'm suggesting
there are any bugs, of course ...)