From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: can someone help me with this code (explanation)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:48:35 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m03jp8$rv7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a352821d-bdcc-4598-8843-3262382cadb9@googlegroups.com>
 <m01adf$7tp$1@dont-email.me>
 <6e1f86e6-c17a-428e-bb19-460c5ba26c8a@googlegroups.com>
 <c8j0lhFl112U1@mid.individual.net>
 <1ec7272d-de7f-43dd-be30-009c437011de@googlegroups.com>
 <c8jb5lFns5kU1@mid.individual.net> <m024t3$j1p$1@dont-email.me>
 <m0335c$mto$1@dont-email.me> <m036bm$8h6$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:47:52 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="23e59b4906029a0ce22afc4c4b1f25ee";
 logging-data="28647"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BhyW29Q7a3w4EFh/ftjpk"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0
In-Reply-To: <m036bm$8h6$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:taKN9W0fNedw2ODJU4r9tpe/EQU=
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189166
Date: 2014-09-26T13:48:35+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2014-09-26 09:58, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> Le 26/09/2014 09:04, Björn Lundin a écrit :
>> Or by using a protected object as a semaphore
>>
> But why? It's so simpler with a task:

Yes. But

Some people in this group likes to optimize code.
Having a render-vouz between two tasks, I think,
is more expensive that calling a protected object.

Personally, I'd go for the serializing task model, as
you propose.


The post was mere a reflection over Niklas'
solution, and Jeffrey's correct objection
over blocking I/O in protected objects


--
Björn