From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: More reliable compilers (of some programming langauges) than GNAT Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:15:49 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <2fca0f38-833e-485d-9a38-febcdd507bb1@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f2fc23972cbddf29dc3e82693fbd1ab2"; logging-data="4014"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/44gppsDT89M+X5PErZpK0s1JETxjj/9U=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IEQ/NNR1k7iIYr4pVBcnLwmxyLQ= sha1:nyeBaU7XVfjs19v+UNjhFa4LpzU= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49054 Date: 2017-11-22T14:15:49+00:00 List-Id: Victor Porton writes: > Randy Brukardt wrote: >> BTW, one reason for this is that there is a freely available independent >> test suite for Ada (the ACATS), so it is highly unlikely to see an Ada >> compiler that can't process some basic construct. So far as I'm aware, all > > See > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027#c17 > for such a bug (recently found by me, about shared libraries). As I noted there, this problem doesn't occur on macOS or debian jessie.