From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 'raise' in aspects? Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:20:13 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <85siilc88t.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85h9ywasfq.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="71797db6fbf0039ebda7a9c799ddb33f"; logging-data="722"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Yf6qamFVSz+aLb59OH7Bqzy03qYS/1xs=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iPEJT/i4DYe2i/8bVq1Qz6vllVw= sha1:Mb371/rgZnmRYWirNpu9/xKQpQ4= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22697 Date: 2014-10-24T08:20:13+01:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > You can write > raise Program_Error with "Not yet implemented"; > in any function (since a raise expression matches any type), and you don't > have to dream up a useless dummy return value to do so. actually return raise Program_Error with "Not yet implemented"; of course. I liked (but haven't had reason to try; I had already spent far too long generating "useless dummy return values") Bob Duff's recursive solution: function F return Boolean is begin raise Program_Error with "Not yet implemented"; return F; end F;