From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada design bug or GNAT bug? Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 08:46:17 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4lrj5zz2u2z.u8x9cf7xzic6.dlg@40tude.net> <58f64fa9-7d0b-44dd-870c-77d9afcb82c4@googlegroups.com> <4228c0ea-837d-42a0-b2a8-a98d8d30f820@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c762050aff3a30866fa7e79999b14776"; logging-data="856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+dm0BiEvjo9DCiD2pDg8uJkBVxGph8vag=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9HAWuQQk2I7pVCi4wNy8ulp9c7Q= sha1:88FJKeYEXcI8gQUcoDH2x08dtJ8= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26605 Date: 2015-07-04T08:46:17+01:00 List-Id: Shark8 writes: > Also, I seem to recall your dislike of INTERFACEs -- in hindsight, > what would you have done differently if you needed the mechanism of > "Type T has functions X, Y, and X" applied to a group of types? > Generics, or some variations thereof? Generic signature packages?