From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,1488a75895e849b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.89.133 with SMTP id bo5mr455302wib.6.1360922603698;
        Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 g1ni12261wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.86.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!usenetcore.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.meeh.mikalv.net!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Converting a C/C++ statement to Ada
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:14:25 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lywquercwe.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <51192116$0$30527$703f8584@news.kpn.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="0a6ca0935c728e617c1a2d4bdcfc6a33";
	logging-data="31737"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180U52qHey7Ea9MeZlFf0sNw43HuXoBQqY="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rWKqP59tspId+c2B3pKRf7TnX+4=
	sha1:FHt9F3P3aLKfZtruwPMJki/GHkQ=
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2013-02-11T17:14:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"ldries46" <bertus.dries@planet.nl> writes:

> Can anyone tell me the Ada equivalent for the following C/C++
> statement
>
> typedef void (*Apple) (Pair *two_side, pointer_type user_data,
> Error_type *error);

I think it's something like

   type Apple is access procedure (two_side : access Pair;
                                   user_data : ?;
                                   error : access Error_type);

but of course the parameters may well not need to be accesses.