From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Your wish list for Ada 202X Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:39:48 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <7f1c01c5-3563-4b94-9831-152dbbf2ecdc@googlegroups.com> <2014041719553920093-rblove@airmailnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="17b46ff0ef6492aedc2232708a5c5eff"; logging-data="14489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/orESQAf0qsE7mtAOfUn3nY6JnEoFea1A=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2kv4burnFvLpwxLB9JcXkGhTLnk= sha1:h6xi7w6SCXmTc2BAmd1a+ovsMPY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19370 Date: 2014-04-18T12:39:48+01:00 List-Id: Robert Love writes: > On 2014-03-25 21:41:16 +0000, Stoik said: > >> I think that even a casual user of Ada should be able to influence >> somehow the new version of Ada. I wonder what is high on your list >> of wishes for Ada 202X? >> I suspect many of the proposals could be tested in GNAT before being >> introduced (or rejected) in the new version. One could add a switch >> to GNAT indicating that we want to use some of the experimental >> features. > > How about that it comes to be in my lifetime. Make that my working > lifetime. There is such a switch : -gnatX, "language extensions permitted". I don't think that there are any such extensions to actually _be_ permitted at the moment, there certainly have been in the past.