From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Linux kernel module - memory allocation
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:52:47 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lywq04yjv4.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <slrnmlj8k2.9gf.achsis_of_elvis@tmoeller-laptop.ad.here.com>
 <crtnpmFj143U1@mid.individual.net>
 <slrnmljbka.9gf.achsis_of_elvis@tmoeller-laptop.ad.here.com>
 <crugp5FpgruU1@mid.individual.net> <mjd7qh$7ta$1@dont-email.me>
 <8759d49e-c30a-4c71-a3e5-fd7a818a30f6@googlegroups.com>
 <slrnmllijn.bfv.achsis_of_elvis@tmoeller-laptop.ad.here.com>
 <c124e4d7-a661-4dbe-a7e5-e525679b2967@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="1d9954c1724cfc8838c424c9c295bd19";
 logging-data="1505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18T+i9FW4BM4/z+4n+kUHpSyEKGcfIaxvU="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QaIXHyqCxqGNTFhYTS2phLrRp2Y=
 sha1:cUu13CbBFEk4Lbhvu/yDxsxmTXg=
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193229
Date: 2015-05-19T10:52:47+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

jan.de.kruyf@gmail.com writes:

> On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 7:30:37 AM UTC+2, q.kontinuum wrote:

>> > Somewhere in the discussion I saw "no runtime". This is obsolete
>> > now.  you are supposed to have some runtime even if it is empty, I
>> > suppose.
>> 
>> I didn't find anything about this. Do you have some additional
>> information?
>> 
>
> file:///usr/gnat/share/doc/gnat/html/gnat_rm_2.html#SEC6 (on my machine)
> -------------------- 	
> pragma No_Run_Time;
>
> This is an obsolete configuration pragma that historically was used to
> setup what is now called the "zero footprint" library. It causes any
> library units outside this basic library to be ignored. The use of
> this pragma has been superseded by the general configurable run-time
> capability of GNAT where the compiler takes into account whatever
> units happen to be accessible in the library.

Has anyone pointed to http://wiki.osdev.org/Ada_Bare_bones yet?