From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Re-write a file in Ada
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 18:37:57 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lywpr6g2d6.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <77e47c8b-7dcc-4e86-8f89-1f348cdf08dd@googlegroups.com>
	<f39a3b30-d34f-4d2a-8ffa-94af9541d9d5@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="378129f99c3c32c8ce464f7428f5f75e";
	logging-data="21595"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2IUBghGSIhgXmsCDS4NjyAlkGTN1fyhk="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JE8BexGECFadMVv0cYcIP3zcyvo=
	sha1:DOtfPJCeokMZ2mpY1ncoMPA4Fqs=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29153
Date: 2016-01-18T18:37:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

comicfanzine@gmail.com writes:

>>Store your strings in one of the containers from >the Ada.Containers library.
>
>>-- Brian
>
> Thanks anyway but , that isn't what i asked .
>
> All that is must be done for now is :
>
> Creating a array , which it size must be known according to the number
> of lines in the file .
>
> There is a real issue , if this can't be done without your package .

You may have asked about creating an array, but I very much doubt that's
your actual problem; I suspect it's your *solution*, and it's wrong.

> Plus , here :
> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Libraries/Ada.Containers
>
> It Say : " This language feature is only available in Ada 2005 " .
>
> Wich is not good for portability ( different environnement ( e.g compilor) ) .

So which compiler do you propose to use? one that adheres to a
20-year-old version of the standard?

> In conclusion , i better use another way .

On your own, then.