From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Intervention needed? Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 23:14:09 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87wokhk289.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <87va01gv3t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f22768342ee73fb2683faa1c3573684c"; logging-data="982"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Q1gWGZ+TwpLVY3lveltfhZQ8Y2EJ85jg=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bxMxDjDgt9XhBZqYozZa8KCJ3lI= sha1:XBM/pBTjE4z+tJbI5he9CPavpWw= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56041 Date: 2019-04-01T23:14:09+01:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > The only way to make such a check that wouldn't trigger all of the > time would require looking at both the body and the call at the same > time -- a complete abandonment of privacy and separation of concerns. But it would be the compiler looking, not me.