From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Use of expression function in protected type Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:05:15 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8878eaae66d49f7d529ec3c7abf78fb7"; logging-data="30456"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vwKTLyYfC279Yit54iDi3gtJDpq/B3/E=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WqeFru7cCAW263mRBWFa1hGGFIc= sha1:NaCx5rmjfiUYiV6d3ofEA/T16sI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24697 Date: 2015-01-22T18:05:15+00:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > I said: > >> Certainly not deliberate, I'm pretty sure no one ever considered >> it. We will now (I've forwarded a version of your message to >> Ada-Comment). > > Early returns are that it is an oversight. It'll be on the agenda for > next week's ARG phone call, and quite possibly it will get included in > the upcoming Corrigendum. If so, it probably will be close to the > fastest official Ada fix ever... Wow!