From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Formal Subprogram Access
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:38:43 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyvaeyi4x8.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <p5l6bd$ete$1@dont-email.me> <p5lne2$fe9$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<p5mflm$ibq$1@dont-email.me> <p5tudq$5eb$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<lyeflpkrh3.fsf@pushface.org> <p6019s$hmo$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<lymv0bk59g.fsf@pushface.org> <p633tm$cur$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<p64106$9g$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="a67a9dc89aff97d2b3dcf6ea27c3ab3c";
	logging-data="4064"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19s6PgcQJs+s5J3OJvxW4LlhrTnl/oNKYQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+xWBzqT11ftLmbBkB0YpqfKb1w0=
	sha1:hR/3LKpQADjZLzwJ2fhXim+h6Gg=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50457
Date: 2018-02-15T16:38:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> writes:

> On 2018-02-14, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message 
>> news:lymv0bk59g.fsf@pushface.org...
>>>
>>> Good news!
>>>
>>> For info, my current 8.0.1 20180207 results, vs 4.1f, are
>>>
>>> # of expected passes 2500
>>> # of unexpected failures 9
>>> # of expected failures 1451
>>> # of unresolved testcases 11
>>> # of unsupported tests 121
>>> *** FAILURES: c250002  cxd1003 cxd1004 cxd1005 cxd4007  cxd2006 cxd3001 
>>> cxd3002  c611a04
>>
>> This is similar to the list of C-Tests that the ACATS tools report as 
>> failed.
>>
>
> Does the testsuite also report the number of unexpected passes ?

It would if there were any.

> I don't see a line for that above, and if the number is zero, I would
> expect to see a line of output confirming that.

So far as I can tell, this behaviour is consistent with other GCC
tests. Certainly with "make check-gnat".

The GCC ACATS tests are run by a shell script, unlike all (?) the other
tests which are run via dejagnu, and the current script in GCC 
reports PASSes and FAILs unconditionally and UNSUPPORTED if non-zero (it
doesn't check XPASS, because it doesn't run B or L tests which are the
ones expected to fail).