From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 64-bit unsigned integer? Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:35:35 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <421d1598-68d7-4d0b-b596-6e9c59cf865c@googlegroups.com> <877eqxe7u8.fsf@nightsong.com> <87muzsz6s2.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4cc54f234a1bf931e5c37fdebf83263c"; logging-data="2078"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pYEJ8fnFsXk7aD/hI5P24ddTk46N5zqU=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wiHUKdh+e/p3XMm7z84eBRqMxQM= sha1:k1XqvjSns2CuKTIa96C6nwljMVI= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50738 Date: 2018-03-01T08:35:35+00:00 List-Id: Niklas Holsti writes: > As long as the new numeric libraries let us write computations using > the normal algebraic syntax (A * B + C), I have nothing against > library solutions. See Ada.Numerics.Generic_Real_Arrays. Also, operator precedence is defined by the operator, not the package in which it's declared for a particular type.