From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,21aaebbd9205357c
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
X-Received: by 10.180.183.180 with SMTP id en20mr2798272wic.3.1363060784439;
        Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 g1ni60719wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Please list all the Ada libraries you know
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:03:49 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyr4jso6qi.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <ab19cb2d-ffeb-4ab9-aba6-763ec930cfd1@googlegroups.com>
	<ad59aa66-bfc9-4a7d-b004-3c911579b012@googlegroups.com>
	<op.wted5udrule2fv@cardamome>
	<69291c5f-ffce-4b48-a1c5-aa76f308082f@googlegroups.com>
	<kh1f3c$6d2$1@dont-email.me>
	<cd72c22c-a401-4aa9-959e-4b437313b3be@googlegroups.com>
	<kh6ms7$jl9$1@dont-email.me> <op.wti5qqewule2fv@cardamome>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="72a7bb6120f61bc7749e29c9c2e535af";
	logging-data="30437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18WPbTMAVN/WGP6zDSuXXTDwrZWiH/JTNo="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TFJQY0S92UFjvmErU3zeb0h4lfY=
	sha1:FJbi/L+Ah6ajy9QLZzrV1nOz4h0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-03-06T16:03:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_rm/Pragma-Source_005fFile_005fName.html
> The above says:
>> The optional Index argument should be used when afile contains
>> multiple units, and when you do notwant to use gnatchop to separate
>> then into multiplefiles
>
> I did not knew GNAT can do this. Noted. It happened I read people
> coming from Pascal, complaining Ada (well Ada with GNAT) needs to many
> files (separate files for spec and body). The next time I read this
> complaint, I will redirect to this GNAT pragma.

But it's a lot of work to set up/maintain either the configuration
pragmas of package Naming. Much simpler to gnatchop the lot and have
done with it.