From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Difference between gprbuild and gnatmake Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:12:46 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e067077027e00849a00e33f09368d9b7"; logging-data="26880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CtK70Rl4LwovVyB4R2TH2oKDAHSy2e2Y=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CX0K4k16uu2L/313RiHG3Dt8lck= sha1:uavcgoOuwoTlNnNEN7uhbP42170= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47401 Date: 2017-07-13T15:12:46+01:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 1:03:52 AM UTC-5, Simon Wright wrote: >> gnatmake is part of the compiler suite (it's used in the compiler >> build). gprbuild is not part of the compiler; it used only to be >> generally available in source form as part of GNAT GPL releases, but >> nowadays it's on github[1]. > > This is misleading. gprbuild is in the GNAT GPL and supported > releases; since 2014 it's bundled with the compiler. Agree that binary releases from AdaCore contain a matching gprbuild. But other binary releases didn't; for example, Debian and my Mac releases had to use the latest source from GNAT GPL. If you build the compiler from sources there will be a gnatmake; but there will not be a gprbuild, because gprbuild is not part of the compiler itself.