From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Precisely why can't official FSF GNAT maintainers copy bug fixes in GNAT & its GCC-contained runtime en masse from GNAT GPL Community Edition? Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 17:29:58 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <9c3a75d6-a01f-4cfa-9493-10b8b082ead8@googlegroups.com> <114db2c4-1e8c-4506-8d7c-df955dd9f808@googlegroups.com> <87d0yc1lsq.fsf@nightsong.com> <878t901jp4.fsf@nightsong.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="25c73b1301d872a4ef34651acedb48a8"; logging-data="10684"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195hpjajpTeocL0L9cZOUi8cjuymUMBmM0=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zt/ns4OMHnThdR7Pw1bq4H9WRn8= sha1:d7dfLsAkkeqmTQBSGMzp97J6Krs= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51974 Date: 2018-05-04T17:29:58+01:00 List-Id: Simon Clubley writes: > There are two code bases; the AdaCore one and the FSF one. Pretty sure there's one code base, with a branch that AdaCore use to support their customers, and another for FSF GCC. The fact that merges are one-way doesn't negate this. > The FSF assignment controls the FSF code base only. When I was a supported AdaCore customer, the source (3.16a1, at least 15 years ago) had (c) FSF with GMGPL extensions. Further evidence: now that gnatcoll is on github, you can look at the sources for yourself[1]. In particular, note that COPYING.RUNTIME was added 7 years ago! [1] https://github.com/AdaCore/gnatcoll-core