From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2013 bug?
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:11:35 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lypptmrgi0.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <19fr4wmxmen$.gjbias2fj461$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <b89f7b9a-1437-4e46-ace1-1355cc2a16c5@googlegroups.com>
 <hrkm713gcc7n$.mep6a9ijq09k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <72539e4c-dddd-40e4-82e8-14c4f2016ccc@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="ab63a21f76991e88ee5b3b5ea015b144";
 logging-data="31270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/a/f9ZrgS6P5iXdtlpFvd9ljoQ/BPdmO8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:L0Y3VIoTD+FDlKbEN3gsIy3Ix0U=
 sha1:tdlIrjkQugphNeptzky4ADyitp0=
X-Original-Bytes: 1441
Date: 2013-08-09T17:11:35+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@aol.com> writes:

> In some of the examples in your later post (like the one where Q is
> private and the full type is a tagged record), there isn't a problem
> either, since the procedure isn't dispatching.

So when GNAT says, at the procedure call, that a null value isn't
allowed and that CE will be raised, it's wrong?