From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 14:16:38 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyppidne4p.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net>
 <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <J3rmv.287368$Nf2.155042@fx01.iad> <lndulo$2d1$1@dont-email.me>
 <5b446648-8193-46c4-b99c-015d86983758@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="a4a86ddfabe7a860897511d47e5acc83";
 logging-data="22672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bhpXrB8y+WutevSI6yD7m0QO/t0VRmg8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OidEzaZTUjkOqghAn/+Vw7BBSEA=
 sha1:BxFWIews9DDxOOy7t92UjDcTPA8=
X-Original-Bytes: 1814
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186893
Date: 2014-06-13T14:16:38+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

gvdschoot@gmail.com writes:

> The thing is: The languages with more options will win. You see that
> with the Rust vs Go people. Go is a language that is close to
> Oberon-14, with very well thought simplicity. Rust on the other hand
> is *the* C++ replacement and it has all the features that makes code
> hard to understand. But because of all these features it attracts the
> developers of today. Non-determinism is a very good thing
> IMO. Reasonability results in good code that is easy to maintain. But
> we don't live in that world anymore.

I _hope_ you're being sarcastic.