From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Writing Linux Kernel Modules in Ada Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:39:58 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <9ccbd90f-74c0-402b-9b2a-ff475ec2198b@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0352b356cf0dea528e1f2af8b5021380"; logging-data="24198"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wCd6H8q4/fSC8Fv+6yMYJo7DTZv2RGIo=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:d9GKt9kE7PAHa/pTvVStCX58KHg= sha1:F5f6/8CkMHEG7ICUiZmbBSHmLAY= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32253 Date: 2016-11-06T09:39:58+00:00 List-Id: artium@nihamkin.com writes: > Part 2, incorporating the secondary stack into the run time. > > http://www.nihamkin.com/2016/11/05/writing-linux-modules-in-ada-part-2/ Interesting! What about elaboration? Have you considered the restriction No_Elaboration_Code? (would it help?) (On a purely personal note, I find heavy grey (and black) backgrounds painful to read.)