From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: exercices Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 15:36:11 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <39c697ca-014d-4736-ab76-0e240fa77971@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cec595888f8967b41b3a8a8d6edeae89"; logging-data="14184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+11qtlNnkM6K+K+OlKosQtx2UhIyrQs5M=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WuDSrKwCTx5C39YHqld7RMZ3CY8= sha1:rVLIdC37xr6zJD7doyWCCkXpPuY= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49655 Date: 2017-12-27T15:36:11+00:00 List-Id: Niklas Holsti writes: > Anyway, if one replies to only a part of a long message, it is IMO > better to quote that part (only) in the reply, even if the reader > shows both the original and the reply at once. Yes! Please!