From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: When to expect bugs fixed?
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:36:59 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyoasqgijo.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <m3350l$jg4$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <87fve2u876.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <lywq7eh7bm.fsf@pushface.org>
 <lysii2h70j.fsf@pushface.org> <m33oh9$675$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="e614caa3bbcdcdac946afd88f128a08d";
 logging-data="19799"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/hvx6Tb1uVZtfu1UBAYTOvW71HodN8Cfs="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+UTP5o1aZ26/5o5OxgHVXh4JkNQ=
 sha1:xfkCpQSffmbAROw43v+jZlpInX8=
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:190279
Date: 2014-11-02T07:36:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:

> Simon Wright wrote:
>
>> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>> 
>>> generic
>>>    type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C
>>>    compatibility type Record_Type_Access is access Record_Type; -- should
>>>    have convention C
>>> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is
>>>
>>>    subtype Access_Type is Record_Type_Access;
>> 
>> Or even
>> 
>> ========================================================================
>> generic
>>    type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C 
> compatibility
>>    type Access_Type is access Record_Type; -- should have convention C
>> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is> 
> ========================================================================
>
> I think, this is wrong: It tempts to use Access_Type which is NOT
> convention C by default!

I would have been (only very slightly) less inclined to suggest this if
you had not already said (in the line above) that Record_Type "should be
an untagged record for C". But it's a *workround*!!